#ADOBE FLASH PLAYER 9 WINDOWS 98 KEYGEN#
If I didn't have a working FP 9, I'd be SOL on YouTube !Īs I explained, in the present day, I can watch much, much more Flash content while browsing the web with FP 9 with than with FP 8. YouTube now supports both FP 8 and FP 9, but at some point in the future I'm sure they will discontinue support for FP 8. (This message is stated differently on different sites, but it is basically equivalent to what I've just said.)
That is, on a given website, FP 9 might work fine, but FP 8 might not work at all - and, in this case, you would get a message saying you needed a later version of FP to watch the Flash content. You say, "I would say, if FP8 on FF2 works for you, why not just leave it at that?"Īs you know - or, at least, I hope you know - different websites support different minimum Flash Player versions. I thought with your expertise, that you could clear up any "mere speculation" or misunderstanding that I might have. That is, these FP 9 versions will crash on some sites (or videos), whereas on other sites (or videos) these FP 9 versions will work fine.
To be more general, "(NS_type_browser)/YouTube/(FP_9_version) conflict" should be replaced with "(NS_type_browser)/(Internet_web_site)/(FP_9_version) conflict", since FP 9 versions newer than 9r_47 exhibit unpredictable behavior. What I tried to do was to rephrase it a little to show my understanding of the factors contributing to a possible (NS_type_browser)/YouTube/(FP_9_version) conflict that could lead to the NPSWF32.dll error or a computer crash or hang. I said that I was basing my comments on poster # 3's comments. Indeed, it is possible that it is "mere speculation". You say, "It is also possible that this is mere speculation."
0 kommentar(er)
